Options
Bangerter, Adrian
Nom
Bangerter, Adrian
Affiliation principale
Fonction
Professeur.e ordinaire
Email
adrian.bangerter@unine.ch
Identifiants
Résultat de la recherche
Voici les éléments 1 - 10 sur 12
- PublicationAccès libreFrom Forest to Zoo: Domain Adaptation in Animal Behavior Recognition for Great Apes with ChimpBehave(2024-06-17)
; ; ; ; This paper addresses the significant challenge of recognizing behaviors in non-human primates, specifically focusing on chimpanzees. Automated behavior recognition is crucial for both conservation efforts and the advancement of behavioral research. However, it is significantly hindered by the labor-intensive process of manual video annotation. Despite the availability of large-scale animal behavior datasets, the effective application of machine learning models across varied environmental settings poses a critical challenge, primarily due to the variability in data collection contexts and the specificity of annotations. In this paper, we introduce ChimpBehave, a novel dataset featuring over 2 hours of video (approximately 193,000 video frames) of zoo-housed chimpanzees, meticulously annotated with bounding boxes and behavior labels for action recognition. ChimpBehave uniquely aligns its behavior classes with existing datasets, allowing for the study of domain adaptation and cross-dataset generalization methods between different visual settings. Furthermore, we benchmark our dataset using a state-of- theart CNN-based action recognition model, providing the first baseline results for both within and cross-dataset settings. The dataset, models, and code can be accessed at: https://github.com/MitchFuchs/ChimpBehave - PublicationAccès libreInternational use of laughter in bonobos and chimpanzees?(Neuchâtel : Université de Neuchâtel, 2024)
; ; ; Caroline FrynsAlthough laughter is generally associated with humor and was long thought to be uniquely human, growing evidence highlights its existence in other species like primates or rats. Research on nonhuman primates’ laughter emphasizes its emotionality and context-specificity as it mostly occurs during play or when tickled, whereas human voluntary laughter presents such functional flexibility that no classification system seems to exhaust its meaning. Although laughter is identified as a tool to coordinate joint actions by easing transitions between topics and by managing social relationships in humans, these patterns have not yet been investigated in other primates. Focusing on dyadic social play in two species of great apes, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), we explore the interaction of coordination (transition between moments of an interaction) and social relationships (rank differences and social bond strength) in predicting laughter presence (1/0) and type (contact/non-contact). We show not only that laughter is used to reengage play in apes, but also that non-contact laughter seems to be a specialized coordination tool used to intentionally reengage play-activity in apes, almost absent at other moments of the interaction, be it during the Main Body or at other transition points. Rank differences and social bond strength did not however appear significant predictors neither of laughter presence nor of type. Although the same patterns were observed between species and although laughter quantity was not directly assessed, bonobos showed a higher propensity to laugh during the Main Body of the interaction and when reengaging play than chimpanzees. - PublicationAccès libreEvery product needs a process: unpacking joint commitment as a process across species(2022-7-25)
; ; ; - PublicationAccès libreHow 2- and 4-year-old children coordinate social interactions with peers(2022-7-25)
; ; ; - PublicationAccès libreEvidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions.(2021-12-01T00:00:00Z)
; ; ; ; - PublicationAccès libreAssessing joint commitment as a process in great apes.(2021-08-20T00:00:00Z)
; ; ; ; ; - PublicationAccès libreBonobos engage in joint commitment(2020-12-18)
; ; ; ; - PublicationAccès libreHow apes get into and out of joint actions: Shared intentionality as an interactional achievement(2020)
; ; ; Compared to other animals, humans appear to have a special motivation to share experiences and mental states with others (Clark, 2006; Grice, 1975), which enables them to enter a condition of ‘we’ or shared intentionality (Tomasello & Carpenter, 2005). Shared intentionality has been suggested to be an evolutionary response to unique problems faced in complex joint action coordination (Levinson, 2006; Tomasello, Carpenter, Call, Behne, & Moll, 2005) and to be unique to humans (Tomasello, 2014). The theoretical and empirical bases for this claim, however, present several issues and inconsistencies. Here, we suggest that shared intentionality can be approached as an interactional achievement, and that by studying how our closest relatives, the great apes, coordinate joint action with conspecifics, we might demonstrate some correlate abilities of shared intentionality, such as the appreciation of joint commitment. We provide seven examples from bonobo joint activities to illustrate our framework. - PublicationMétadonnées seulementEndogenous oxytocin predicts helping and conversation as a function of group membership(2018-7-4)
; ; ; ; Humans cooperate with unrelated individuals to an extent that far outstrips any other species. We also display extreme variation in decisions about whether to cooperate or not, and the mechanisms driving this variation remain an open question across the behavioural sciences. One candidate mechanism underlying this variation in cooperation is the evolutionary ancient neurohormone oxytocin (OT). As current research focuses on artificial administration of OT in asocial tasks, little is known about how the hormone in its naturally occurring state actually impacts behaviour in social interactions. Using a new optimal foraging paradigm, the ‘egg hunt’, we assessed the association of endogenous OT with helping behaviour and conversation. We manipulated players' group membership relative to each other prior to an egg hunt, during which they had repeated opportunities to spontaneously help each other. Results show that endogenous baseline OT predicted helping and conversation type, but crucially as a function of group membership. Higher baseline OT predicted increased helping but only between in-group players, as well as decreased discussion about individuals’ goals between in-group players but conversely more of such discussion between out-group players. Subsequently, behaviour but not conversation during the hunt predicted change in OT, in that out-group members who did not help showed a decrease in OT from baseline levels. In sum, endogenous OT predicts helping behaviour and conversation, importantly as a function of group membership, and this effect occurs in parallel to uniquely human cognitive processes. - PublicationAccès libreEndogenous oxytocin predicts helping and conversation as a function of group membership.(2018-07-04T00:00:00Z)
; ; ; Humans cooperate with unrelated individuals to an extent that far outstrips any other species. We also display extreme variation in decisions about whether to cooperate or not, and the mechanisms driving this variation remain an open question across the behavioural sciences. One candidate mechanism underlying this variation in cooperation is the evolutionary ancient neurohormone oxytocin (OT). As current research focuses on artificial administration of OT in asocial tasks, little is known about how the hormone in its naturally occurring state actually impacts behaviour in social interactions. Using a new optimal foraging paradigm, the 'egg hunt', we assessed the association of endogenous OT with helping behaviour and conversation. We manipulated players' group membership relative to each other prior to an egg hunt, during which they had repeated opportunities to spontaneously help each other. Results show that endogenous baseline OT predicted helping and conversation type, but crucially as a function of group membership. Higher baseline OT predicted increased helping but only between in-group players, as well as decreased discussion about individuals' goals between in-group players but conversely more of such discussion between out-group players. Subsequently, behaviour but not conversation during the hunt predicted change in OT, in that out-group members who did not help showed a decrease in OT from baseline levels. In sum, endogenous OT predicts helping behaviour and conversation, importantly as a function of group membership, and this effect occurs in parallel to uniquely human cognitive processes.