Logo du site
  • English
  • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site
  • English
  • Français
  • Se connecter
  1. Accueil
  2. Université de Neuchâtel
  3. Publications
  4. Argumentative euphemisms, political correctness and relevance
 
  • Details
Options
Vignette d'image

Argumentative euphemisms, political correctness and relevance

Auteur(s)
Sytnyk, Andriy
Editeur(s)
De Saussure, Louis 
Institut des sciences de la communication et de la cognition 
Hart, Christopher
Oswald, Steve 
Institut de langue et littérature anglaises 
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
Date de parution
2014
Mots-clés
  • euphemisms
  • political correctness
  • taboo
  • connotations
  • Relevance Theory
  • neo-Gricean pragmatics
  • euphemisms

  • political correctness...

  • taboo

  • connotations

  • Relevance Theory

  • neo-Gricean pragmatic...

Résumé
The account presented in the thesis combines insights from relevance-theoretic (Sperber and Wilson 1995) and neo-Gricean (Levinson 2000) pragmatics in arguing that a specific euphemistic effect is derived whenever it is mutually manifest to participants of a communicative exchange that a speaker is trying to be indirect by avoiding some dispreferred saliently unexpressed alternative lexical unit(s). This effect is derived when the indirectness is not conventionally associated with the particular linguistic form-trigger relative to some context of use and, therefore, stands out as marked in discourse. The central theoretical claim of the thesis is that the cognitive processing of utterances containing novel euphemistic/politically correct locutions involves meta-representations of saliently unexpressed dispreferred alternatives, as part of relevance-driven recognition of speaker intentions. It is argued that hearers are “invited” to infer the salient dispreferred alternatives in the process of deriving explicatures of utterances containing lexical units triggering euphemistic/politically correct interpretations. In the course of time, such invited inferences can lead to semantic change by becoming routinized relative to some context of use and reanalyzed as the defeasible default meanings of these locutions, presumed in the absence of contextual assumptions to the contrary. This conventionalization process is responsible for euphemisms becoming “contaminated” with negative connotations associated with taboos, which leads to their recycling in the vernacular or ‘euphemism treadmill’. It also explains why political correctness is effective only when it is novel and still capable of bringing people’s unconscious biases to consciousness. The biases are, arguably, brought to consciousness by metarepresenting the salient dispreferred alternatives as part of comprehension of utterances containing PC locutions perceived to be marked in the given context. It is suggested that the likelihood of the euphemism treadmill taking place is increased in cases of narrowing the lexicalized meaning of a concept to its taboo meaning, while it is less likely to happen in cases of conceptual broadening.
Notes
Thèse de doctorat : Université de Neuchâtel, 2014
Identifiants
https://libra.unine.ch/handle/123456789/8226
_
10.35662/unine-thesis-2415
Type de publication
doctoral thesis
Dossier(s) à télécharger
 main article: 00002415.pdf (2.08 MB)
google-scholar
Présentation du portailGuide d'utilisationStratégie Open AccessDirective Open Access La recherche à l'UniNE Open Access ORCIDNouveautés

Service information scientifique & bibliothèques
Rue Emile-Argand 11
2000 Neuchâtel
contact.libra@unine.ch

Propulsé par DSpace, DSpace-CRIS & 4Science | v2022.02.00