Logo du site
  • English
  • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site
  • English
  • Français
  • Se connecter
  1. Accueil
  2. Université de Neuchâtel
  3. Publications
  4. PACIC instrument: Disentangling dimensions using published validation models
 
  • Details
Options
Vignette d'image

PACIC instrument: Disentangling dimensions using published validation models

Auteur(s)
Iglesias, Katia 
Laboratoire d'études des processus sociaux 
Burnand, Bernard
Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
Date de parution
2014
In
International Journal for quality in Health Care, Oxford University Press, 2014/26/3/250-260
Mots-clés
  • chronic care model
  • validation analyses
  • confirmatory factorial analysis
  • diabetes
  • chronic care model

  • validation analyses

  • confirmatory factoria...

  • diabetes

Résumé
<i>Objective</i> To better understand the structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) instrument. More specifically to test all published validation models, using one single data set and appropriate statistical tools. <br> <i>Design</i> Validation study using data from cross-sectional survey. <br> <i>Participants</i> A population-based sample of non-institutionalized adults with diabetes residing in Switzerland (canton of Vaud). <br> <i>Main outcome measure</i> French version of the 20-items PACIC instrument (5-point response scale). We conducted validation analyses using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The original five-dimension model and other published models were tested with three types of CFA: based on (i) a Pearson estimator of variance–covariance matrix, (ii) a polychoric correlation matrix and (iii) a likelihood estimation with a multinomial distribution for the manifest variables. All models were assessed using loadings and goodness-of-fit measures. <br> <i>Results</i> The analytical sample included 406 patients. Mean age was 64.4 years and 59% were men. Median of item responses varied between 1 and 4 (range 1–5), and range of missing values was between 5.7 and 12.3%. Strong floor and ceiling effects were present. Even though loadings of the tested models were relatively high, the only model showing acceptable fit was the 11-item single-dimension model. PACIC was associated with the expected variables of the field. <br> <i>Conclusions</i> Our results showed that the model considering 11 items in a single dimension exhibited the best fit for our data. A single score, in complement to the consideration of single-item results, might be used instead of the five dimensions usually described.
Identifiants
https://libra.unine.ch/handle/123456789/6339
_
10.1093/intqhc/mzu042
Type de publication
journal article
Dossier(s) à télécharger
 main article: OUP_Iglesias_Katia_-_PACIC_instrument_Disentangling_dimensions_using_published_20160425.pdf (604.51 KB)
google-scholar
Présentation du portailGuide d'utilisationStratégie Open AccessDirective Open Access La recherche à l'UniNE Open Access ORCIDNouveautés

Service information scientifique & bibliothèques
Rue Emile-Argand 11
2000 Neuchâtel
contact.libra@unine.ch

Propulsé par DSpace, DSpace-CRIS & 4Science | v2022.02.00