Logo du site
  • English
  • Français
  • Se connecter
Logo du site
  • English
  • Français
  • Se connecter
  1. Accueil
  2. Université de Neuchâtel
  3. Publications
  4. Indicators for taxonomic and functional aspects of biodiversity in vineyard agro-ecosystem of Southern Switzerland
 
  • Details
Options
Vignette d'image

Indicators for taxonomic and functional aspects of biodiversity in vineyard agro-ecosystem of Southern Switzerland

Auteur(s)
Trivellone, Valeria
Schoenenberger, Nicola
Bellosi, Bruno
Jermini, Mauro
de Bello, Francesco
Mitchell, Edward 
Institut de biologie 
Moretti, Marco
Date de parution
2014-3-11
In
Biological Conservation
No
170
De la page
103
A la page
109
Mots-clés
  • Biodiversity surrogates Functional indices Indicator species Switzerland Vineyard floor vegetation
  • Biodiversity surrogat...

Résumé
t is widely accepted that the concept of biodiversity embraces two essential and complementary com- ponents: taxonomic and functional diversity. Our goal is to produce a list of plant species predictive of high taxonomic and functional biodiversity values and discuss their use within biodiversity monitoring programmes. We selected a representative sample of 48 vineyard areas from Southern Switzerland, and vegetation from the ground cover was sampled from within a total of 120 sampling plots. We con- sidered ten widely used functional traits and selected six taxonomic and functional indices. We applied a two-step analysis: (i) using Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis (TITAN) based on the above mentioned bio- diversity indices, we defined 3 groups of sampling plots with low (L), medium (M) and high (H) biodiver- sity values; (ii) using the Indicator Value analysis, we identify indicator species that are significantly associated with the above-mentioned groups and their combinations. In total, 259 vascular plants were identified across the sampling plots. As a whole, 52 species were significant indicators for groups with high and mid-to-high biodiversity values. Out of all indicator species, 24 (46%) were exclusively selected by functional biodiversity indices whereas only 10 (19%) were associated with taxonomic indices. Eigh- teen (35% of the total) species were selected by both types of indices. We point out that indicator species associated with two different aspects of biodiversity show a high degree of complementarity. Our results emphasize the need to consider functional aspects of biodiversity in diversity-conservation strategies when the objectives are to preserve both taxonomic diversity and ecosystem functioning.
Identifiants
https://libra.unine.ch/handle/123456789/20206
Type de publication
journal article
google-scholar
Présentation du portailGuide d'utilisationStratégie Open AccessDirective Open Access La recherche à l'UniNE Open Access ORCIDNouveautés

Service information scientifique & bibliothèques
Rue Emile-Argand 11
2000 Neuchâtel
contact.libra@unine.ch

Propulsé par DSpace, DSpace-CRIS & 4Science | v2022.02.00