Résultat de la recherche
Analysing Implicit premises within children’s argumentative inferences
La logique interlocutoire permet-elle d'identifier les apprentissages défecteux?
Revisiting the Piagetian test of conservation of quantities of liquid: argumentation within the adult-child interaction
Processus interlocutoires dans une tâche de conservation des liquides : comment imputer des connaissances à un interactant à propos du concept de conservation des liquides
Revisiting the piagetian test of conservation of quantities of liquid: argumentation within the adult-child interaction
The aim of this paper is to explain the interest of revisiting the classical piagetian test of conservation of quantities of liquid, in order to reconsider Piaget's statements about argumentation in children. Contrarily to Piaget, we make the hypothesis that to a certain extent argumentation is co-constructed by the actors within the specific setting in which they interact, i.e. during the testing situation. We observe how children construct conversational moves in connection with the adult's interventions. Piaget considered children's statements as dependent on the cognitive level (i. e. logical): we expect the children's arguments to be also the result of the interactions with the tester and in particular of his/her framing of what is at stake.