Vignette d'image

Mitchell, Edward

Nom
Mitchell, Edward
Affiliation principale
Site web
Fonction
Professeur ordinaire
Email
edward.mitchell@unine.ch
Identifiants
https://libra.unine.ch/handle/123456789/357
_
0000-0003-0358-506X

Résultat de la recherche

Filtres

5
41
5
Réinitialiser les filtres

Paramètres

Voici les éléments 1 - 5 sur 5
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Ribosomal RNA genes challenge the monophyly of the hyalospheniidae (Amoebozoa : Arcellinida)
    (2008)
    Lara, Enrique 
    ;
    Heger, Thierry J
    ;
    Ekelund, Flemming
    ;
    Lamentowicz, Mariusz
    ;
    Mitchell, Edward 
    To date only five partial and two complete SSU rRNA gene sequences are available for the lobose testate amoebae (Arcellinida). Consequently, the phylogenetic relationships among taxa and the definition of species are still largely dependant on morphological characters of uncertain value, which causes confusion in the phylogeny, taxonomy and the debate on cosmopolitanism of free-living protists. Here we present a SSU rRNA-based phylogeny of the Hyalospheniidae including the most common species. Similar to the filose testate amoebae of the order Euglyphida the most basal clades have a terminal aperture; the ventral position of the pseudostome appears to be a derived character. Family Hyalospheniidae appears paraphyletic and is separated into three clades: (1) Heleopera sphagni, (2) Heleopera rosea and Argynnia dentistoma and (3) the rest of the species from genera Apodera, Hyalosphenia, Porosia and Nebela. Our data support the validity of morphological characters used to define species among the Hyalospheniidae and even suggest that taxa described as varieties may deserve the rank of species (e.g. N. penardiana var. minor). Finally our results suggest that the genera Hyalosphenia and Nebela are paraphyletic, and that Porosia bigibbosa branches inside the main Nebela clade. (c) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Ribosomal RNA Genes Challenge the Monophyly of the Hyalospheniidae (Amoebozoa: Arcellinida)
    (2008)
    Lara, Enrique 
    ;
    Heger, Thierry J.
    ;
    Ekelund, Flemming
    ;
    Lamentowicz, Mariucz
    ;
    Mitchell, Edward 
    To date only five partial and two complete SSU rRNA gene sequences are available for the lobose testate amoebae (Arcellinida). Consequently, the phylogenetic relationships among taxa and the definition of species are still largely dependant on morphological characters of uncertain value, which causes confusion in the phylogeny, taxonomy and the debate on cosmopolitanism of free-living protists. Here we present a SSU rRNA-based phylogeny of the Hyalospheniidae including the most common species. Similar to the filose testate amoebae of the order Euglyphida the most basal clades have a terminal aperture; the ventral position of the pseudostome appears to be a derived character. Family Hyalospheniidae appears paraphyletic and is separated into three clades: (1) Heleopera sphagni, (2) Heleopera rosea and Argynnia dentistoma and (3) the rest of the species from genera Apodera, Hyalosphenia, Porosia and Nebela. Our data support the validity of morphological characters used to define species among the Hyalospheniidae and even suggest that taxa described as varieties may deserve the rank of species (e.g. N. penardiana var. minor). Finally our results suggest that the genera Hyalosphenia and Nebela are paraphyletic, and that Porosia bigibbosa branches inside the main Nebela clade.
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    SSU rRNA reveals a sequential increase in shell complexity among the euglyphid testate amoebae (Rhizaria : Euglyphida)
    (2007)
    Lara, Enrique 
    ;
    Heger, Thierry J
    ;
    Mitchell, Edward 
    ;
    Meisterfeld, Ralf
    ;
    Ekelund, Flemming
    The existing data on the molecular phylogeny of filose testate amoebae from order Euglyphida has revealed contradictions between traditional morphological classification and SSU rRNA phylogeny and, moreover, the position of several important genera remained unknown. We therefore carried out a study aiming to fill several important gaps and better understand the relationships among the main euglyphid testate amoebae and the evolutionary steps that led to the present diversity at a higher level. We obtained new SSU rRNA sequences from five genera and seven species. This new phylogeny obtained shows that (1) the clade formed by species of genera Assulina and Placocista branches unambiguously at the base of the subclade of Euglyphida comprising all members of the family Trinematidae and genus Euglypha, (2) family Trinematidae (Trachelocorythion, Trinema, and Corythion) branches as a sister group to genus Euglypha, (3) three newly sequenced Euglypha species (E. cf. ciliata, E. penardi, and E. compressa) form a new clade within the genus. Since our results show that Assulina and Placocista do not belong to the Euglyphidae (unless the Trinematidae are also included in this family), we propose the creation of a new family named Assulinidae. Consequently, we give a family status to the genera Euglypha and (tentatively) Scutiglypha, which become the new family Euglyphidae. The evolutionary pattern suggested by SSU rRNA phylogeny shows a clear tendency towards increasing morphological complexity of the shell characterised by changes in the symmetry (migration of the aperture to a ventral position and/or compression of the shell) and the appearance of specialised scales at the aperture (in families Trinematidae and Euglyphidae). (C) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    SSU rRNA Reveals a Sequential Increase in Shell Complexity Among the Euglyphid Testate Amoebae (Rhizaria: Euglyphida)
    (2007)
    Lara, Enrique 
    ;
    Heger, Thierry J.
    ;
    Mitchell, Edward 
    ;
    Meisterfeld, Ralf
    ;
    Ekelund, Flemming
    The existing data on the molecular phylogeny of filose testate amoebae from order Euglyphida has revealed contradictions between traditional morphological classification and SSU rRNA phylogeny and, moreover, the position of several important genera remained unknown. We therefore carried out a study aiming to fill several important gaps and better understand the relationships among the main euglyphid testate amoebae and the evolutionary steps that led to the present diversity at a higher level.
    We obtained new SSU rRNA sequences from five genera and seven species. This new phylogeny obtained shows that (1) the clade formed by species of genera Assulina and Placocista branches unambiguously at the base of the subclade of Euglyphida comprising all members of the family Trinematidae and genus Euglypha, (2) family Trinematidae (Trachelocorythion, Trinema, and Corythion) branches as a sister group to genus Euglypha, (3) three newly sequenced Euglypha species (E. cf. ciliata, E. penardi, and E. compressa) form a new clade within the genus.
    Since our results show that Assulina and Placocista do not belong to the Euglyphidae (unless the Trinematidae are also included in this family), we propose the creation of a new family named Assulinidae. Consequently, we give a family status to the genera Euglypha and (tentatively) Scutiglypha, which become the new family Euglyphidae.
    The evolutionary pattern suggested by SSU rRNA phylogeny shows a clear tendency towards increasing morphological complexity of the shell characterised by changes in the symmetry (migration of the aperture to a ventral position and/or compression of the shell) and the appearance of specialised scales at the aperture (in families Trinematidae and Euglyphidae).
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Soil protistology rebooted: 30 fundamental questions to start with
    Geisen, Stefan
    ;
    Mitchell, Edward 
    ;
    Wilkinson, David M
    ;
    Adl, Sina
    ;
    Bonkowski, Michael
    ;
    Brown, Matthew W
    ;
    Fiore-Donno, Anna Maria
    ;
    Heger, Thierry 
    ;
    Jassey, Vincent E.J
    ;
    Krashevska, Valentyna
    ;
    Lahr, Daniel J.G
    ;
    Marcisz, Katarzyna
    ;
    Mulot, Matthieu 
    ;
    Payne, Richard
    ;
    Singer, David 
    ;
    Anderson, Roger O
    ;
    Charman, Dan J
    ;
    Ekelund, Flemming
    ;
    Griffiths, Bryan S
    ;
    Rønn, Regin
    ;
    Smirnov, Alexey
    ;
    Bass, David
    ;
    Belbahri, Lassaâd 
    ;
    Berney, Cédric
    ;
    Blandenier, Quentin 
    ;
    Blandenier, Quentin
    ;
    Chatzinotas, Antonis
    ;
    Clarholm, Marianne
    ;
    Dunthorn, Micah
    ;
    Feest, Alan
    ;
    Fernández, Leonardo D
    ;
    Foissner, Wilhelm
    ;
    Fournier, Bertrand 
    ;
    Gentekaki, Eleni
    ;
    Hájek, Michal
    ;
    Helder, Johannes
    ;
    Jousset, Alexandre
    ;
    Koller, Robert
    ;
    Kumar, Santosh
    ;
    La Terza, Antonietta
    ;
    Lamentowicz, Mariusz
    ;
    Mazei, Yuri
    ;
    Santos, Susana S
    ;
    Seppey, Christophe V.W
    ;
    Spiegel, Frederick W
    ;
    Walochnik, Julia
    ;
    Winding, Anne
    ;
    Lara, Enrique 
    Protists are the most diverse eukaryotes. These microbes are keystone organisms of soil ecosystems and regulate essential processes of soil fertility such as nutrient cycling and plant growth. Despite this, protists have received little scientific attention, especially compared to bacteria, fungi and nematodes in soil studies. Recent methodological advances, particularly in molecular biology techniques, have made the study of soil protists more accessible, and have created a resurgence of interest in soil protistology. This ongoing revolution now enables comprehensive investigations of the structure and functioning of soil protist communities, paving the way to a new era in soil biology. Instead of providing an exhaustive review, we provide a synthesis of research gaps that should be prioritized in future studies of soil protistology to guide this rapidly developing research area. Based on a synthesis of expert opinion we propose 30 key questions covering a broad range of topics including evolution, phylogenetics, functional ecology, macroecology, paleoecology, and methodologies. These questions highlight a diversity of topics that will establish soil protistology as a hub discipline connecting different fundamental and applied fields such as ecology, biogeography, evolution, plant-microbe interactions, agronomy, and conservation biology. We are convinced that soil protistology has the potential to be one of the most exciting frontiers in biology.