Options
Institut des sciences du langage et de la communication
Organisation mère
Téléphone
+41 32 718 1987
Rue
Espace Louis-Agassiz 1
Code postal
2000
Ville
Neuchâtel
Pays
CH
Type d'institution
Academic Institute
Identifiants
1053 Résultats
Voici les éléments 1 - 10 sur 1053
- PublicationMétadonnées seulementSocial-interactional approaches tu SLA: A state of the art and some future perspectives(2013)In this paper I address the current state of the art in social-interactional research on SLA. I first provide a brief outline of the historical development of those lines of research that are commonly subsumed under the (broad) heading of ‘social-interactional approaches’, and I discuss their conceptual underpinnings as well as some of their research results. I then focus specifically on current research in what has become a major driving force in socially oriented research on SLA, namely conversation analysis (CA-SLA). I discuss some of the empirical evidence CA-SLA has offered for L2 learning as a socio-cognitive process bound up with the moment-to-moment unfolding of L2 speakers’ social practices. I also review its contribution to our understanding of L2 interactional competence and its development over time. I conclude by sketching avenues for future research.
- PublicationAccès libreOpposition argumentative et opposition non argumentative: le cas des expressions italiennes quando et mentre(2009)L'intento di queste pagine è quello di illustrare un caso di apparente ''sinonimia'' di due espressioni connettive temporali in un loro impiego oppositivo. I due connettivi si presentano, in questo uso, perfettamente intercambiabili nella maggior parte dei casi. Quelle configurazioni che invece non permettono la presenza di uno dei due connettivi (secondo criteri ben diversi da quelli che ne differenziano l'uso temporalmente) permettono di mostrare come la caratteristica predominante di quando sia il suo carattere argomentativo. È questa sua capacità di orientare il discorso, creando una dinamica argomentativa, a fornire la risposta più convincente per una descrizione delle due espressioni che renda conto del loro diverso funzionamento al di là del movimento di opposizione creato da entrambi in contesti simili.
- PublicationMétadonnées seulementLes apports de la dialectologie à une linguistique de demain : quelques réflexions inspirées par le polymorphisme du francoprovençal valaisan(2008)
; - PublicationMétadonnées seulement
- PublicationAccès libreThe polysemy of devoir: a contrastive and diachronic analysis(Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2009)
; ; Spiridon, Adriana - PublicationAccès libreSans quoi : une procédure de justification a contrario purement anaphorique(2004-2)
; Lefeuvre, FlorenceLa mise en relation de deux énonciations (X et Y) par la locution prépositive sans quoi se fait sur le mode d’un procédé anaphorique classique, selon lequel la locution prend comme antécédent l’état de choses évoqué en X et accommode comme antécédent à la proposition exprimée en Y l’état de choses contraire à celui donné en X. Le lien de dépendance qui unit la proposition exprimée en Y à son antécédent accommodé assure la possibilité d’enclencher une lecture a contrario responsable du lien de justification qui va de Y à X. In the structure ’X sans quoi Y’, the prepositional phrase sans quoi places two utterances (namely X and Y) in an anaphoric relation. The antecedent of the prepositional phrase is the state of affairs referred to in X ; the opposite state of affairs is accommodated as the antecedent of the proposition given in Y. These two propositions (i.e. the proposition being accommodated and the one conveyed by Y) are interdependent. Their link may give rise to a reading of the type ’a contrario’, which makes possible the rhetorical procedure of justification Connecting Y to X. - PublicationMétadonnées seulement
- PublicationAccès libreAnaphora in Conversation: Grammatical Coding and Preference Organization(2000-4-11)This articles explores some socio-interactional motivations for speakers' use of identificationally overspecified anaphoric expressions, i.e. full NP when pronouns would be possible. A qualitative analysis of empirically occurring conversational data was undertaken, drawing from functionalist approaches to grammar and conversation analytic approach to talk-in-interaction. It shows that the preference organization of talk, and namely the preference for agreement, serves as an organizing principle for speakers' anaphoric choices, affecting their grammatical codings (such as lexical NP) as well as the syntactic construction around them (such as left-dislocations and topicalization). This observation provides empirical support for the idea that the functioning of anaphora in social interaction is not limited to referent tracking and information structure alone, but is fundamentally related to the social organization of talk.