The battle over rights in Switzerland: populist arguments against international law
Publisher
Lund: Nordic Academic Press
Date issued
2019
In
Europe at the Crossroads: confronting Populist, Nationalist, and Global Challenges
From page
259
To page
280
Abstract
If there is a genuine conflict of laws between federal and inter national
law, Switzerland’s obligation under international law takes precedence;
this applies even to agreements that do not concern human
rights or fundamental freedoms. The precedence set out above also
applies in relation to subsequent federal laws, i.e. those which have
entered into force in accordance with international law; the lex posterior
rule does not apply in the relationship between international
law and national law. Switzerland cannot invoke its domestic law to
justify the non-fulfilment of a treaty. Accordingly, federal legislation
contrary to international law remains regularly inapplicable. (Federal
Court Ruling BGE (2012) 139 I 16, p. 28)
law, Switzerland’s obligation under international law takes precedence;
this applies even to agreements that do not concern human
rights or fundamental freedoms. The precedence set out above also
applies in relation to subsequent federal laws, i.e. those which have
entered into force in accordance with international law; the lex posterior
rule does not apply in the relationship between international
law and national law. Switzerland cannot invoke its domestic law to
justify the non-fulfilment of a treaty. Accordingly, federal legislation
contrary to international law remains regularly inapplicable. (Federal
Court Ruling BGE (2012) 139 I 16, p. 28)
Later version
https://nordicacademicpress.se/product/europe-at-the-crossroads/
Publication type
book part
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
2021-11-25_2580_9423.pdf
Type
Main Article
Size
202 B
Format
Adobe PDF
