Rock mass strength at depth and implications for pillar design

Construction of infrastructure in deep underground mines depends on both an understanding of near wall rock behaviour as well as the ultimate load bearing capacity of confined rock, and thus on a reliable strength criterion for the rock near and far from the excavation. The topic of brittle failing rock, i.e. rock failure dominated by tensile crack and fracture propagation even under low overall compressive conditions, is briefly summarized. Recently, it was suggested that the failure envelop for the entire confinement range of brittle rocks and rock masses is distinctly s-shaped. If validated, this impacts engineering problems such as pillar design where both wall instability and confined rock mass stability issues need to be considered.
This paper explores limitations and potential opportunities in pillar design. It is illustrated that current empirical design rules may be flawed and further studies are required to arrive at more economic designs for pillars at depth, or under high stress, and in brittle failing rock masses. When confined in the core of pillars, the rock mass may exhibit superior strength than typically assumed by Mohr-Coulomb or Hoek-Brown failure criteria as it will fail differently than near the wall. As a result, pillar strength may be underestimated based on field observations and if procedures of rock strength back-analysis from near wall-behaviour are adopted to determine the rock mass strength envelop. As a result, the strengths of pillars with width to height ratios (W/H) exceeding 1.5 to 2 may be systematically underestimated and may become burstprone, as the core may not yield as anticipated. As a consequence, pillar designs based on current empirical rules may be inadvertently conservative and thus not optimal from an economic perspective. This aspect is of particular interest for block cave mines where drawpoint spacing may have a significant impact on cave propagation, recovery performance, and economics.