Turlings, Ted

2014, Veyrat, Nathalie, Turlings, Ted

Afin de se protéger contre les attaques d’insectes herbivores, les plantes ont développé de multiples moyens de défense, dont la libération de composés volatils induits par les herbivores (HIPVs). Ces composés volatils peuvent être utilisés par les ennemis naturels des herbivores tels que les prédateurs et les parasitoïdes. D’autre part, ils peuvent être exploités par les herbivores eux-mêmes pour localiser leurs plantes hôtes. Certains HIPVs peuvent aussi avertir les tissus non attaqués d’une même plante ou les plantes voisines d’un risque d’attaque. Le terme employé est “priming”. Les plantes averties pourront ainsi répondre plus rapidement et de manière plus efficace lorsque l’attaque se produira. Tandis que certains HIPVs ont été bien étudiés, le rôle de beaucoup d’autre reste à trouver. Par exemple, nous n’avons que peu de connaissances en ce qui concerne l’indole, un composé dominant du mélange de volatils émis par les plantes. Dans la thèse présentée ici, nous avons étudié le rôle de l’indole dans les défenses directes et indirectes du maïs grâce à l’utilisation de plantes mutantes dans la production d’indole et d’indole synthétique.
Dans le premier chapitre, nous avons étudié le rôle de l’indole en tant que signal de défense. Nous fournissons la preuve que l’indole est essentiel pour le “priming” d’autres HIPVs au sein d’une même plante mais qu’il agit aussi comme signal de communication entre différentes plantes afin de les préparer à une possible attaque. Dans le deuxième chapitre, nous avons étudié l’effet de l’indole sur un insecte herbivore généraliste, Spodoptera littoralis. Nous démontrons que l’indole agit en tant de défense directe chez le maïs en repoussant les adultes et les chenilles de cette espèce et en réduisant la survie des chenille et le succès reproducteur des adultes. Dans le troisième chapitre, nous avons étudié l’importance de l’indole au niveau du troisième niveau trophique. Nous avons trouvé que malgré une attraction de certains parasitoïdes, une exposition à l’indole protège les chenilles de l’espèce S. littoralis en augmentant leur résistance contre les parasitoïdes. Dans le quatrième chapitre, nous avons étudié la spécificité des effets trouvés dans les deux chapitres précédents. Nous avons trouvé que ni le degré de spécialisation pour les plantes hôtes, ni l’origine phylogénétique, ni l’association avec des plantes produisantde l’indole ne déterminent la réponse des insectes herbivores et des ennemis naturels à l’indole. Nous concluons que le rôle de l’indole est dépendant des espèces.
D’une manière générale, cette thèse contribue à une meilleure compréhension du rôle de l’indole dans les intéractions entre les plantes, les insectes herbivores et les ennemis naturels; elle confirme le rôle multiple des composés volatils dans les intéractions tri-trophiques., In order to counter herbivore attacks, plants have developed a multitude of defence strategies, including the release herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs). HIPVs can be used as foraging cues by natural enemies of the herbivores, including predators and parasitoids. In addition, they can also be exploited by herbivores themselves to localize their host plants. Some HIPVs even prime non-attacked plant tissues or neighbouring plants to respond faster and more strongly to subsequent attacks. Whereas some HIPVs have been well studied, the role of many others remains unclear. For instance, little is known about indole, a major constituent of the herbivore-induced volatile blend. In the present thesis, we studied the role of indole in direct and indirect defences in maize using indole deficient mutants and synthetic indole.
In Chapter 1 we investigated the role of indole as a plant defence signal. We provide evidence that indole is essential for within-plant priming of other HIPVs and acts as a between-plant signal that primes non-attacked neighbours. In Chapter 2, we investigated the impact of indole on the generalist herbivore Spodoptera littoralis. We demonstrate that volatile indole acts as a direct defence in maize by repelling S. littoralis moths and caterpillars and by reducing the survival of early instar caterpillars and the reproductive output of adults. In Chapter 3, we studied the importance of indole on the third trophic level. We found that, although indole attracts certain parasitoids, indole-exposure protects S. littoralis caterpillars by increasing their resistance against parasitism. In Chapter 4, we investigated the specificity of the effects found in chapters 2 and 3. We found that neither the degree of host plant specialization nor the phylogenetic origin or the association with indole-producing plants determines the response of herbivores and natural enemies to the volatile, and that the role of indole is highly species-specific.
Overall, this thesis contributes to a better understanding of the role of indole in interactions between plants, herbivore insects and natural enemies and highlights the diverse roles of HIPVs in tritrophic interactions.

2006, D'Alessandro, Marco, Held, Matthias, Triponez, Yann, Turlings, Ted

After herbivore attack, plants release a plethora of different volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which results in odor blends that are attractive to predators and parasitoids of these herbivores. VOCs in the odor blends emitted by maize plants (Zea mays) infested by lepidopteran larvae are well characterized. They are derived from at least three different biochemical pathways, but the relative importance of each pathway for the production of VOCs that attract parasitic wasps is unknown. Here, we studied the importance of shikimic acid derived VOCs for the attraction of females of the parasitoids Cotesia marginiventris and Microplitis rufiventris. By incubating caterpillar-infested maize plants in glyphosate, an inhibitor of the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phospate (EPSP) synthase, we obtained induced odor blends with only minute amounts of shikimic acid derived VOCs. In olfactometer bioassays, the inhibited plants were as attractive to naive C. marginiventris females as control plants that released normal amounts of shikimic acid derived VOCs, whereas naive M. rufiventris females preferred inhibited plants to control plants. By adding back synthetic indole, the quantitatively most important shikimic acid derived VOC in induced maize odors, to inhibited plants, we showed that indole had no effect on the attraction of C. marginiventris and that M. rufiventris preferred blends without synthetic indole. Exposing C. marginiventris females either to odor blends of inhibited or control plants during oviposition experiences shifted their preference in subsequent olfactometer tests in favor of the experienced odor. Further learning experiments with synthetic indole showed that C. marginiventris can learn to respond to this compound, but that this does not affect its choices between natural induced blends with or without indole. We hypothesize that for naive wasps the attractiveness of an herbivore-induced odor blend is reduced due to masking by nonattractive compounds, and that during oviposition experiences in the presence of complex odor blends, parasitoids strongly associate some compounds, whereas others are largely ignored.

2008, Rostas, Michael, Turlings, Ted

Plants under attack by caterpillars emit volatile compounds that attract the herbivore's natural enemies. In maize, the caterpillar-induced production of volatiles involves the phytohormone jasmonic acid (JA). In contrast, pathogen attack usually up-regulates the salicylic acid (SA)-pathway and results in systemic acquired resistance (SAR) against plant diseases. Activation of the SA-pathway has often been found to repress JA-dependent direct defenses, but little is known about the effects of SAR induction on indirect defenses such as volatile emission and parasitoid attraction. We examined if induction of SAR in maize, by chemical elicitation with the SA-mimic benzo-(1,2,3)-thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester (BTH), attenuates the emission of volatiles induced by Spodoptera littoralis or exogenously applied JA. In addition, we determined how these treatments affected the attractiveness of the plants to the parasitoid Microplitis rufiventris in a six-arm-olfactometer. BTH treatment alone resulted in significant systemic resistance of maize seedlings against the pathogen Setosphaeria turcica, but had no detectable effect on volatile emissions. Induction of SAR significantly reduced the emission rates of two compounds (indole and (E)-beta-caryophyllene) in JA-treated plants, whereas no such negative cross-talk was found in caterpillar-damaged plants. Surprisingly, however, BTH treatment prior to caterpillar-feeding made the plants far more attractive to the parasitoid than plants that were only damaged by the herbivore. Control experiments showed that this response was due to plant-mediated effects rather than attractiveness of BTH itself. We conclude that in the studied system, plant protection by SAR activation is compatible with and can even enhance indirect defense against herbivores. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

2006, Rostas, Michael, Ton, Jurriaan, Mauch-Mani, Brigitte, Turlings, Ted

Plants attacked by insects release volatile compounds that attract the herbivores' natural enemies. This so-called indirect defense is plastic and may be affected by an array of biotic and abiotic factors. We investigated the effect of fungal infection as a biotic stress agent on the emission of herbivore-induced volatiles and the possible consequences for the attraction of two parasitoid species. Maize seedlings that were simultaneously attacked by the fungus Setosphaeria turcica and larvae of Spodoptera littoralis emitted a blend of volatiles that was qualitatively similar to the blend emitted by maize that was damaged by only the herbivore, but there was a clear quantitative difference. When simultaneously challenged by fungus and herbivore, the maize plants emitted in total 47% less of the volatiles. Emissions of green leaf volatiles were unaffected. In a six-arm olfactometer, the parasitoids Cotesia marginiventris and Microplitis rufiventris responded equally well to odors of herbivore-damaged and fungus- and herbivore-damaged maize plants. Healthy and fungus-infected plants were not attractive. An additional experiment showed that the performance of S. littoralis caterpillars was not affected by the presence of the pathogen, nor was there an effect on larvae of M. rufiventris developing inside the caterpillars. Our results confirm previous indications that naive wasps may respond primarily to the green leaf volatiles.