Voici les éléments 1 - 2 sur 2
Vignette d'image
Publication
Accès libre

Evidence of joint commitment in great apes' natural joint actions.

2021-12-01T00:00:00Z, Heesen, Raphaela, Zuberbühler, Klaus, Bangerter, Adrian, Iglesias, Katia, Rossano, Federico, Pajot, Aude, Guéry, Jean-Pascal, Genty, Emilie

Human joint action seems special, as it is grounded in joint commitment-a sense of mutual obligation participants feel towards each other. Comparative research with humans and non-human great apes has typically investigated joint commitment by experimentally interrupting joint actions to study subjects' resumption strategies. However, such experimental interruptions are human-induced, and thus the question remains of how great apes naturally handle interruptions. Here, we focus on naturally occurring interruptions of joint actions, grooming and play, in bonobos and chimpanzees. Similar to humans, both species frequently resumed interrupted joint actions (and the previous behaviours, like grooming the same body part region or playing the same play type) with their previous partners and at the previous location. Yet, the probability of resumption attempts was unaffected by social bonds or rank. Our data suggest that great apes experience something akin to joint commitment, for which we discuss possible evolutionary origins.

Vignette d'image
Publication
Accès libre

How apes get into and out of joint actions: Shared intentionality as an interactional achievement

2020, Genty, Emilie, Heesen, Raphaela, Guéry, Jean-Pascal, Rossano, Federico, Zuberbühler, Klaus, Bangerter, Adrian

Compared to other animals, humans appear to have a special motivation to share experiences and mental states with others (Clark, 2006; Grice, 1975), which enables them to enter a condition of ‘we’ or shared intentionality (Tomasello & Carpenter, 2005). Shared intentionality has been suggested to be an evolutionary response to unique problems faced in complex joint action coordination (Levinson, 2006; Tomasello, Carpenter, Call, Behne, & Moll, 2005) and to be unique to humans (Tomasello, 2014). The theoretical and empirical bases for this claim, however, present several issues and inconsistencies. Here, we suggest that shared intentionality can be approached as an interactional achievement, and that by studying how our closest relatives, the great apes, coordinate joint action with conspecifics, we might demonstrate some correlate abilities of shared intentionality, such as the appreciation of joint commitment. We provide seven examples from bonobo joint activities to illustrate our framework.