An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems
Author(s)
Veres, Andrea
Wyckhuys, Kris A. G.
Kiss, Jozsef
Tóth, Ferenc
Burgio, Giovanni
Pons, Xavier
Avilla, Carlos
Vidal, Stefan
Razinger, Jaka
Bazok, Renata
Matyjaszczyk, Ewa
Milosavljević, Ivan
Le, Xuan Vi
Zhou, Wenwu
Zhu, Zeng-Rong
Tarno, Hagus
Hadi, Buyung
Lundgren, Jonathan
Bonmatin, Jean-Marc
van Lexmond, Maarten Bijleveld
Rauf, Aunu
Furlan, Lorenzo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Date issued
June 4, 2020
In
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Vol
27
No
24
From page
29867 p.
To page
29899 p.
Reviewed by peer
true
Subjects
Neonicotinoids Soil pests Aphids Whitefly Brown planthopper Agricultural policy IPM Biological control Review Article
Abstract
We present a synthetic review and expert consultation that assesses the actual risks posed by arthropod pests in four major crops, identifies targets for integrated pest management (IPM) in terms of cultivated land needing pest control and gauges the implementation “readiness” of non-chemical alternatives. Our assessment focuses on the world’s primary target pests for neonicotinoid-based management: western corn rootworm (WCR, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) in maize; wireworms (Agriotes spp.) in maize and winter wheat; bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) in winter wheat; brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens) in rice; cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii) and silver-leaf whitefly (SLW, Bemisia tabaci) in cotton. First, we queried scientific literature databases and consulted experts from different countries in Europe, North America, and Asia about available IPM tools for each crop-pest system. Next, using an online survey, we quantitatively assessed the economic relevance of target pests by compiling country-level records of crop damage, yield impacts, extent of insecticide usage, and “readiness” status of various pest management alternatives (i.e., research, plot-scale validation, grower-uptake). Biological control received considerable scientific attention, while agronomic strategies (e.g., crop rotation), insurance schemes, decision support systems (DSS), and innovative pesticide application modes were listed as key alternatives. Our study identifies opportunities to advance applied research, IPM technology validation, and grower education to halt or drastically reduce our overreliance on systemic insecticides globally.
ISSN
0944-1344
1614-7499
Publication type
journal article
File(s)
