Repository logo
Research Data
Publications
Projects
Persons
Organizations
English
Français
Log In(current)
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Article de recherche (journal article)
  4. Negotiating without the victim state: the exclusiveness of anticorruption settlements

Negotiating without the victim state: the exclusiveness of anticorruption settlements

Author(s)
Capus, Nadja  
Chaire de droit pénal et de procédure pénale  
Brodersen, Kei Hannah  
Chaire de droit pénal et de procédure pénale  
Date issued
2021
In
Journal of Financial Crime
Vol
29
No
4
From page
1249
To page
1268
Abstract
Purpose
Corporate foreign bribery can have devastating consequences on communities and states. Over the past decade, there have been several promising developments, both national and international, that might increase the chances of victim states to receive remediation for the harm they suffered from foreign bribery. In particular, awareness has risen that victim states must be considered and new innovative items have been added to the toolbox of prosecutors in the fight against corruption that is assumed to also improve victim states’ standing in these procedures. This study aims to assess whether indeed victim states receive compensation through these novel procedures.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses the three case studies of Switzerland, France and England and Wales for a comprehensive empirical and normative analysis of settlement agreements between defendants and prosecution authorities and of court jurisprudence.
Findings
This study shows that although de jure, it seems warranted to order the payment of remedies to victim states within domestic criminal proceedings, in practice, this rarely happens. A number of legal and practical obstacles account for this situation. This study, therefore, calls for the formulation of international guidelines containing the obligation to inform victim states of ongoing criminal proceedings on corporate foreign bribery, and guidance on how to identify the victim of this crime, as well as the damage caused.
Originality/value
This is the first contribution to verify whether claims that settlement agreements, recently introduced in England and Wales and France (and similar procedures are available in Switzerland), are beneficial for victim states in their quest to receive compensation. As this study shows that this is – not yet – the case in practice, this study proposes solutions that could lead the way for remediation of the harm caused by corporate corruption – and thereby, ultimately, to a more just outcome.
Project(s)
RevACLaw - Revamping Anticorruption Criminal Law - La refonte du droit pénal anticorruption  
Publication type
journal article
Identifiers
https://libra.unine.ch/handle/20.500.14713/62412
DOI
10.1108/JFC-11-2021-0247
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Capus_Brodersen_publication_Settlements without Victim States_JFC_2021.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

225.44 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Université de Neuchâtel logo

Service information scientifique & bibliothèques

Rue Emile-Argand 11

2000 Neuchâtel

contact.libra@unine.ch

Service informatique et télématique

Rue Emile-Argand 11

Bâtiment B, rez-de-chaussée

Powered by DSpace-CRIS

libra v2.1.0

© 2026 Université de Neuchâtel

Portal overviewUser guideOpen Access strategyOpen Access directive Research at UniNE Open Access ORCIDWhat's new