Options
Vuille, Joëlle
Résultat de la recherche
Les cheveux roux – A la racine du crime
2019-12-3, Vuille, Joëlle, Kuhn, André
Brebis égarées ou furies d'Hitler? Les femmes et les crimes commis sous le Troisième Reich
2017-12, Vuille, Joëlle, Jaquier Erard, Véronique
La prova del DNA nella pronuncia della cassazione sul caso Amanda Knox e Raffaele Sollecito
2016-7-31, Taroni, Franco, Vuille, Joëlle, Luparia, Luca
Moyens de preuve techniques et appréciation des preuves lors de la reconstruction d’accidents de la route
2015-10-22, Vuille, Joëlle, Arnold, Jörg
L’expertise culturelle : une nécessité dans une procédure pénale moderne ?
2019-6-13, Vuille, Joëlle, Kuhn, André
Evaluation of forensic DNA traces when propositions of interest relate to activities: analysis and discussion of recurrent concerns
2016-12-31, Biedermann, Alex, Champod, Christophe, Jackson, Graham, Gill, Peter, Taylor, D., Butler, J., Morling, N., Hicks, T., Vuille, Joëlle, Taroni, Franco
ENFSI (European Network of Forensic Science Institutes) Guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science, A primer for legal practitioners
2016-4-1, Champod, Christophe, Biedermann, Alex, Vuille, Joëlle, Willis, Sheila, De Kinder, Jan
Role-induced bias in criminal prosecutions
2018-5-14, Egli Anthonioz, Nicole, Schweizer, Mark, Vuille, Joëlle, Kuhn, André
There are two main models of criminal prosecution in the western world. One tasks an independent magistrate (the examining judge) with the duty of conducting the investigation of a given case and transferring all evidence collected to the parties and the trial court. The other vests the prosecution with the task of conducting the investigation before representing the accusation in court. In 2011, a new code of criminal procedure entered into force in Switzerland, forcing most Swiss cantons to transition from the first model to the second. We investigate whether the change in the person conducting the investigation (from examining judge to prosecutor) could introduce or exacerbate bias against or in favor of the defendant. Through an empirical study carried out with students, we tried to determine whether this change might affect the fairness of the proceedings. We contend that the rights of the defense are better safeguarded in the first model than in the second, even if the contrast is not as stark as was initially predicted.
An American advantage? How American and Swiss criminal defense attorneys evaluate forensic DNA evidence
2016-12-1, Vuille, Joëlle, Thompson, W.C.
Digital evidence, ‘absence’ of data and ambiguous patterns of reasoning
2016-4-1, Biedermann, Alex, Vuille, Joëlle