Options
Jaquier Erard, Véronique
Nom
Jaquier Erard, Véronique
Affiliation principale
Fonction
Professeure titulaire, Chargé.e d'enseignement
Identifiants
Résultat de la recherche
Voici les éléments 1 - 9 sur 9
- PublicationMétadonnées seulementMeasurement innovations: Overview of methodological progress and challenges(London: Routledge, 2015)
;Johnson, Holly ;Fisher, Bonnie S.; ;Johnson, Holly ;Fisher, Bonnie S. - PublicationMétadonnées seulement
- PublicationMétadonnées seulementComparative Victim and Offender Research: Findings from around the world(2011-12-9)
; Fisher, Bonnie S. - PublicationMétadonnées seulementPrevalence and risks of physical and sexual violence against women by non-intimates: An exploratory study across nine countries(2011-12-9)
; ;Fisher, Bonnie S.Johnson, Holly - PublicationMétadonnées seulementResearch methods, measures and ethics(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2010)
; ;Johnson, Holly ;Fisher, Bonnie S. ;Renzetti, Claire M. ;Edleson, JeffKennedy Bergen, Raquel - PublicationMétadonnées seulement
- PublicationMétadonnées seulementCross-national survey designs: Equating the National Violence Against Women Survey and the Swiss International Violence Against Women Survey(2006-12-9)
; ;Fisher, Bonnie S.Killias, MartinValid and reliable cross-national estimates of rape are needed to more fully understand the extent and nature of these victimizations. Methodological issues that compromise the integrity of cross-national comparisons of self-report survey data have been identified. These issues have neither been systematically addressed nor is there a consensus as to how to correct them. This paper examines the effects that the definition and operationalization of rape have on completed and attempted rape estimates from the National Violence Against Women Survey in the U.S. and the Swiss component of the International Violence Against Women Survey. Survey design issues related to operationalizing the victim-offender relationship and its effect on rape estimates are discussed. Cross-national rape estimates with and without addressing the comparability issues are presented. The implications for engaging in comparative rape research are also discussed.