Voici les éléments 1 - 9 sur 9
Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Measurement innovations: Overview of methodological progress and challenges

2015, Johnson, Holly, Fisher, Bonnie S., Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Johnson, Holly, Fisher, Bonnie S., Jaquier Erard, Véronique

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Comparative Victim and Offender Research: Cross-National and Cross-Cultural Theoretical Approaches and Methodologies

2011-12-9, Fisher, Bonnie S., Jaquier Erard, Véronique

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Research methods, measures and ethics

2010, Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Johnson, Holly, Fisher, Bonnie S., Renzetti, Claire M., Edleson, Jeff, Kennedy Bergen, Raquel

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Research

2012, Fisher, Bonnie S., Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Postmus, Judy

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Comparative Victim and Offender Research: Findings from around the world

2011-12-9, Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Fisher, Bonnie S.

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Establishing the content validity of threats, physical violence and rape against women across two national surveys

2009-12-9, Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Fisher, Bonnie S.

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Sampling

2012, Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Fisher, Bonnie S., Postmus, Judy

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Prevalence and risks of physical and sexual violence against women by non-intimates: An exploratory study across nine countries

2011-12-9, Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Fisher, Bonnie S., Johnson, Holly

Pas de vignette d'image disponible
Publication
Métadonnées seulement

Cross-national survey designs: Equating the National Violence Against Women Survey and the Swiss International Violence Against Women Survey

2006-12-9, Jaquier Erard, Véronique, Fisher, Bonnie S., Killias, Martin

Valid and reliable cross-national estimates of rape are needed to more fully understand the extent and nature of these victimizations. Methodological issues that compromise the integrity of cross-national comparisons of self-report survey data have been identified. These issues have neither been systematically addressed nor is there a consensus as to how to correct them. This paper examines the effects that the definition and operationalization of rape have on completed and attempted rape estimates from the National Violence Against Women Survey in the U.S. and the Swiss component of the International Violence Against Women Survey. Survey design issues related to operationalizing the victim-offender relationship and its effect on rape estimates are discussed. Cross-national rape estimates with and without addressing the comparability issues are presented. The implications for engaging in comparative rape research are also discussed.