Options
Brunner, Philip
RĂ©sultat de la recherche
When Can Inverted Water Tables Occur Beneath Streams?
2014-5-18, Xie, Y. Q., Cook, Peter G., Brunner, Philip, Irvine, Dylan J., Simmons, Craig Trevor
Decline in regional water tables (RWT) can cause losing streams to disconnect from underlying aquifers. When this occurs, an inverted water table (IWT) will develop beneath the stream, and an unsaturated zone will be present between the IWT and the RWT. The IWT marks the base of the saturated zone beneath the stream. Although a few prior studies have suggested the likelihood of an IWT without a clogging layer, most of them have assumed that a low-permeability streambed is required to reduce infiltration from surface water to groundwater, and that the IWT only occurs at the bottom of the low-permeability layer. In this study, we use numerical simulations to show that the development of an IWT beneath an unclogged stream is theoretically possible under steady-state conditions. For a stream width of 1m above a homogeneous and isotropic sand aquifer with a 47m deep RWT (measured in an observation point 20m away from the center of the stream), an IWT will occur provided that the stream depth is less than a critical value of 4.1m. This critical stream depth is the maximum water depth in the stream to maintain the occurrence of an IWT. The critical stream depth decreases with stream width. For a stream width of 6 m, the critical stream depth is only 1mm. Thus while theoretically possible, an IWT is unlikely to occur at steady state without a clogging layer, unless a stream is very narrow or shallow and the RWT is very deep.
What is a disconnected stream?
2010, Cook, Peter G, Brunner, Philip, Simmons, Craig Trevor, Lamontagne, Sebastien
The Transition from Connected to Disconnected Losing Streams: Conceptual Approaches and Numerical Simulations
2008, Brunner, Philip, Simmons, Craig Trevor, Cook, Peter G
Interpreting streamflow generation mechanisms from integrated surface subsurface flow models of a riparian wetland and catchment
2013-5-18, Joseph Partington, Daniel, Brunner, Philip, Frei, S., Simmons, Craig Trevor, Werner, AD, Therrien, René, Maier, Holger Robert, Dandy, Graeme Clyde, Fleckenstein, JH
Evaluation of outputs from automated baseflow separation methods against simulated baseflow from a physically based, surface water-groundwater flow model
2012-5-18, Joseph Partington, Daniel, Brunner, Philip, Simmons, Craig Trevor, Werner, A. D., Therrien, René, Maier, Holger Robert, Dandy, Graeme Clyde
Baseflow is often considered to be the groundwater discharge component of streamflow. It is commonly estimated using conceptual models, recursive filters or a combination of the two. However, it is difficult to validate these methods due to the current challenges of measuring baseflow in the field. In this study, simulation of a synthetic catchment's response to rainfall is carried out using a fully integrated surface water-groundwater flow model. A series of rainfall events with differing recovery periods and varied antecedent moisture conditions is considered to span a range of different streamflow generation dynamics. Baseflow is estimated for the outlet hydrograph of the synthetic catchment using a selection of commonly used automated baseflow separation methods. These estimates are compared to the baseflow signal obtained from the numerical model, which serves as the control experiment. Results from these comparisons show that depending on the method used, automated baseflow separation underestimates the simulated baseflow by as much as 28%, or overestimates it by up to 74%, during rainfall events. No separation method is found to be clearly superior to the others, as the performance of the various methods varies with different soil types, antecedent moisture conditions and rainfall events. The differences between the various approaches clearly demonstrate that the baseflow separation methods investigated are not universally applicable. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Uncertainty assessment and implications for data acquisition in support of integrated hydrologic models
2012-5-26, Brunner, Philip, Doherty, J., Simmons, Craig Trevor
The data set used for calibration of regional numerical models which simulate groundwater flow and vadose zone processes is often dominated by head observations. It is to be expected therefore, that parameters describing vadose zone processes are poorly constrained. A number of studies on small spatial scales explored how additional data types used in calibration constrain vadose zone parameters or reduce predictive uncertainty. However, available studies focused on subsets of observation types and did not jointly account for different measurement accuracies or different hydrologic conditions. In this study, parameter identifiability and predictive uncertainty are quantified in simulation of a 1-D vadose zone soil system driven by infiltration, evaporation and transpiration. The worth of different types of observation data (employed individually, in combination, and with different measurement accuracies) is evaluated by using a linear methodology and a nonlinear Pareto-based methodology under different hydrological conditions. Our main conclusions are (1) Linear analysis provides valuable information on comparative parameter and predictive uncertainty reduction accrued through acquisition of different data types. Its use can be supplemented by nonlinear methods. (2) Measurements of water table elevation can support future water table predictions, even if such measurements inform the individual parameters of vadose zone models to only a small degree. (3) The benefits of including ET and soil moisture observations in the calibration data set are heavily dependent on depth to groundwater. (4) Measurements of groundwater levels, measurements of vadose ET or soil moisture poorly constrain regional groundwater system forcing functions.
Disconnected surface water and groundwater: from theory to practice
2011-5-26, Brunner, Philip, Cook, Peter G., Simmons, Craig Trevor
When describing the hydraulic relationship between rivers and aquifers, the term disconnected is frequently misunderstood or used in an incorrect way. The problem is compounded by the fact that there is no definitive literature on the topic of disconnected surface water and groundwater. We aim at closing this gap and begin the discussion with a short introduction to the historical background of the terminology. Even though a conceptual illustration of a disconnected system was published by Meinzer (1923), it is only within the last few years that the underlying physics of the disconnection process has been described. The importance of disconnected systems, however, is not widely appreciated. Although rarely explicitly stated, many approaches for predicting the impacts of groundwater development on surface water resources assume full connection. Furthermore, management policies often suggest that surface water and groundwater should only be managed jointly if they are connected. However, although lowering the water table beneath a disconnected section of a river will not change the infiltration rate at that point, it can increase the length of stream that is disconnected. Because knowing the state of connection is of fundamental importance for sustainable water management, robust field methods that allow the identification of the state of connection are required. Currently, disconnection is identified by showing that the infiltration rate from a stream to an underlying aquifer is independent of the water table position or by identifying an unsaturated zone under the stream. More field studies are required to develop better methods for the identification of disconnection and to quantify the implications of heterogeneity and clogging processes in the streambed on disconnection.
Groundwater inflow to a shallow, poorly-mixed wetland estimated from a mass balance of radon
2008-5-26, Cook, Peter G., Wood, Cameron, White, Troy, Simmons, Craig Trevor, Fass, T., Brunner, Philip
Radon activity within a shallow wetland in southern Australia has been measured on three occasions between May and October 2006. Measured activities within the surface water display a similar pattern of spatial variability on each occasion, suggesting that it is related to the locations of groundwater inflow and mixing processes. The mean groundwater inflow rate has been estimated from the mean radon activity using a mass balance approach. The components of the radon budget are (i) contribution from groundwater inflow, (ii) diffusive flux from wetland bottom sediments (iii) loss due to gas exchange, (iv) loss due to radioactive decay, (v) toss due to groundwater or surface water outflow. Also required to complete the water balance are the surface water inflow rate, direct precipitation on the wetland, and evaporation rate. The radon diffusive flux has been estimated from measurements of radon production within the sediments and a diffusive transport model., calibrated by measurements of radon activity in seated chambers that can receive radon only from diffusion and lose it only by radioactive decay. Radon loss due to gas exchange is inferred from the loss rate of SF6, following its injection into isolated areas of the wetland, while the rate of radioactive decay is known. The radon activity in groundwater inflow is measured from sampling piezometers surrounding the wetland. Steady state and transient mass balance approaches yield similar results, with groundwater inflow rates varying between 12 and 18 m(3)/day. Estimated groundwater inflow rates are most sensitive to the radon activity of groundwater inflow, the gas exchange velocity, surface water area and the accuracy with which the mean radon activity in the wetland can be, measured. Importantly, it is relatively insensitive to the surface water inflow rate, which is poorly known. Crown Copyright (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.