Conceptual semantics in a nonhuman primate
Author(s)
Date issued
1999
In
Journal of comparative psychology, American Psychological Association
Vol
113
No
1
From page
33
To page
42
Abstract
Some animal vocalizations have been described as <i>referential</i>, or <i>semantic</i>, because individuals respond to them as if they designate some object or event. Alternatively, subjects may simply attend to the acoustic features of calls rather than their meanings. Field playback experiments on diana monkeys (<i>Cercopithecus diana diana</i>) tested these hypotheses using the calls of leopards and eagles and the males' alarm calls to these predators. In the experiment, 2 calls were played in sequence, separated by 5 min of silence, such that they were either (a) similar in acoustic and semantic features, (b) similar in semantic features only, or (c) different in both acoustic and semantic features. Subjects readily transferred habituation across acoustic but not semantic features, suggesting that they attended to the calls' underlying meanings.
Publication type
journal article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Zuberbuhler_K.-Conceptual_semantics-20140428.pdf
Type
Main Article
Size
10.31 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):ccd4fe66db1692897a7c4ac30e3a6d54
