Vignette d'image

Bangerter, Adrian

Nom
Bangerter, Adrian
Affiliation principale
Site web
Fonction
Professeur ordinaire
Email
adrian.bangerter@unine.ch
Identifiants
https://libra.unine.ch/handle/123456789/498

Résultat de la recherche

Filtres

8
44
8
Réinitialiser les filtres

Paramètres

Voici les éléments 1 - 8 sur 8
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Dynamic social representations of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: shifting patterns of sense-making and blame
    (2013-10-22)
    Mayor, Eric 
    ;
    Eicher, Véronique
    ;
    Bangerter, Adrian 
    ;
    Gilles, Ingrid
    ;
    Clémance, Alain
    ;
    Green, Eva G. T.
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Dynamic collective symbolic coping with disease threat and othering: A case study of avian influenza
    (2013-4-24)
    Gilles, Ingrid
    ;
    Bangerter, Adrian 
    ;
    Clémence, Alain
    ;
    Green, Eva
    ;
    Krings, Franciska
    ;
    Mouton, Audrey
    ;
    Rigaud, David
    ;
    Staerklé, Christian
    ;
    Wagner-Egger, Pascal
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Longitudinal investigation of public trust in institutions relative to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Switzerland
    (2012-11-1)
    Bangerter, Adrian 
    ;
    Krings, Franciska
    ;
    Mouton, Audrey
    ;
    Gilles, Ingrid
    ;
    Green, Eva G. T.
    ;
    Clémence, Alain
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Trust in medical organizations predicts pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination behavior and perceived efficacy of protection measures in the Swiss public
    (2011)
    Gilles, Ingrid
    ;
    Bangerter, Adrian 
    ;
    Clémence, Alain
    ;
    Green, Eva G. T.
    ;
    Krings, Franciska
    ;
    Staerklé, Christian
    ;
    Wagner-Egger, Pascal
    Following the recent avian influenza and pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreaks, public trust in medical and political authorities is emerging as a new predictor of compliance with officially recommended protection measures. In a two-wave longitudinal survey of adults in French-speaking Switzerland, trust in medical organizations longitudinally predicted actual vaccination status 6 months later, during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination campaign. No other variables explained significant amounts of variance. Trust in medical organizations also predicted perceived efficacy of officially recommended protection measures (getting vaccinated, washing hands, wearing a mask, sneezing into the elbow), as did beliefs about health issues (perceived vulnerability to disease, threat perceptions). These findings show that in the case of emerging infectious diseases, actual behavior and perceived efficacy of protection measures may have different antecedents. Moreover, they suggest that public trust is a crucial determinant of vaccination behavior and underscore the practical importance of managing trust in disease prevention campaigns.
  • Publication
    Accès libre
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Lay perceptions of collectives at the outbreak of the H1N1 epidemic: heroes, villains and victims
    (2011)
    Wagner-Egger, Pascal
    ;
    Bangerter, Adrian 
    ;
    Gilles, Ingrid
    ;
    Green, Eva G. T.
    ;
    Rigaud, David
    ;
    Krings, Franciska
    ;
    Staerklé, Christian
    ;
    Clémence, Alain
    Lay perceptions of collectives (e.g., groups, organizations, countries) implicated in the 2009 H1N1 outbreak were studied. Collectives serve symbolic functions to help laypersons make sense of the uncertainty involved in a disease outbreak. We argue that lay representations are dramatized, featuring characters like heroes, villains and victims. In interviews conducted soon after the outbreak, 47 Swiss respondents discussed the risk posed by H1N1, its origins and effects, and protective measures. Countries were the most frequent collectives mentioned. Poor, underdeveloped countries were depicted as victims, albeit ambivalently, as they were viewed as partly responsible for their own plight. Experts (physicians, researchers) and political and health authorities were depicted as heroes. Two villains emerged: the media (viewed as fear mongering or as a puppet serving powerful interests) and private corporations (e.g., the pharmaceutical industry). Laypersons’ framing of disease threat diverges substantially from official perspectives.
  • Publication
    Accès libre
    Trust in Institutions and the COVID-19 Threat: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Public Perception of Official Recommendations and of Othering in Switzerland.
    Gilles, Ingrid
    ;
    Le Pogam, Marie-Annick
    ;
    Perriraz, Margaux
    ;
    Bangerter, Adrian 
    ;
    Green, Eva G T
    ;
    Staerklé, Christian
    ;
    Krings, Franciska
    ;
    Wagner-Egger, Pascal
    ;
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
    To explore how perceived disease threat and trust in institutions relate to vaccination intent, perceived effectiveness of official recommendations, and to othering strategies. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Swiss adults in July 2020. Outcome variables were vaccination intent, perceived effectiveness of official recommendations and othering strategies (labelling a given social group as responsible for the disease and distancing from it). Independent variables were perceived disease threat, trust in various institutions, perceived health-related measures, and sociodemographic variables. Linear and logistic regressions were performed. The response rate was 20.2% (1518/7500). Perceived disease threat and trust in medical/scientific institutions were positively associated with vaccination intent and perceived effectiveness of official recommendations for coronavirus mitigation measures. Only disease threat was associated with a perception of effectiveness among othering strategies. Age and education levels were associated with vaccination intent. Reinforcing trust in medical/scientific institutions can help strengthen the perceived effectiveness of official recommendations and vaccination. It however does not prevent adherence to ineffective protecting measures such as othering strategies, where decreasing perceptions of epidemic threat appears to be more efficient.