Voici les éléments 1 - 5 sur 5
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Modeling transient discharge into a tunnel drilled in a heterogeneous formation
    (2007) ;
    Dematteis, Antonio
    An analytical model is developed to predict transient discharge flow into a tunnel drilled at various speeds through a heterogeneous formation. This model relies on simplifying assumptions commonly enforced in hydrogeologic engineering, and combines the convolution and superposition principles to account for composite sections with arbitrary parametric contrasts. An application to the data monitored during the exploratory drilling of an Alpine tunnel confirms the validity of the approach.
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Confined flow into a tunnel during progressive drilling: An analytical solution
    A convolution integral is developed to evaluate transient, drilling speed-dependent discharge rates into a tunnel gradually excavated in a homogeneous infinite aquifer. Comparison with the classical instantaneous-drilling evaluation commonly used in practice reveals drastically reduced early-time discharge rates, higher maximum rates, and similar long-term rates. Dimensionless-type curves are provided to help assess total discharge sensitivity to drilling time and predict safer maximum flow rates.
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Confined-unconfined flow in a horizontal confined aquifer
    (2003)
    Li, Ling
    ;
    Lockington, D A
    ;
    Barry, D A
    ;
    Parlange, J Y
    ;
    Mixed confined and unconfined groundwater flow occurs in a bounded initially dry aquifer when the hydraulic head at the side boundary suddenly rises above the elevation of the aquifer's top boundary. The flow problem as modelled by the Boussinesq equation is non-trivial because of the involvement of two moving boundaries. The transformed equation (based on a similarity transformation) can, however, be dealt with more easily. Here, we present an approximate analytical solution for this flow problem. The approximate solution is compared with an 'exact' numerical solution and found to be a very accurate description for describing the mixed confined and unconfined flow in the confined aquifer. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    On the hydro-dispersive equivalence between multi-layered mineral barriers
    (2001)
    Guyonnet, Dominique
    ;
    ;
    Come, Bernard
    ;
    Seguin, J J
    ;
    Parriaux, Aurèle
    In the context of municipal solid waste and hazardous waste disposal, the notion of "equivalence" between different barrier designs appears in regulatory documents from several industrialized countries. While in the past, equivalence has been thought of mainly in terms of contaminant travel times, in recent years it has been defined more in terms of the magnitude of a disposal site's potential impact on groundwater resources. This paper presents some original analytical solutions to the problem of contaminant migration through a multi-layered mineral barrier. The solutions account for the two major mechanisms of subsurface contaminant migration, namely, advection and diffusion-dispersion. An example application using the proposed solutions and a numerical model illustrates how one multi-layered mineral barrier can be considered superior to another from a strictly hydro-dispersive viewpoint. The influence of partial saturation of the mineral barrier is investigated using a numerical solution to the Richards equation for unsaturated flow. It is emphasized that conclusions relative to the superiority of one multi-layered barrier, with respect to another, should not only consider hydro-dispersive aspects, but also other processes such as the mechanical and chemical evolutions of the different barrier components. Although such phenomena are poorly addressed by existing models, failure to take them into account, at least in a qualitative fashion, may lead to unconservative conclusions with respect to barrier equivalence. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
  • Publication
    Métadonnées seulement
    Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments
    (1999)
    Guyonnet, Dominique
    ;
    Come, Bernard
    ;
    ;
    Parriaux, Aurèle
    The Monte Carlo method is a popular method for incorporating uncertainty relative to parameter values in risk assessment modeling. But risk assessment models are often used as screening tools in situations where information is typically sparse and imprecise. In this case, it is questionable whether true probabilities can be assigned to parameter estimates, or whether these estimates should be considered as simply possible. This paper examines the possibilistic approach of accounting for parameter value uncertainty, and provides a comparison with the Monte Carlo probabilistic approach. The comparison illustrates the conservative nature of the possibilistic approach, which considers all possible combinations of parameter values, but does not transmit (through multiplication) the uncertainty of the parameter values onto that of the calculated result. In the Monte Carlo calculation, on the other hand, scenarios that combine low probability parameter values have all the less chance of being randomly selected. If probabilities are arbitrarily assigned to parameter estimates, without being substantiated by site-specific field data, possible combinations of parameter values (scenarios) will be eliminated from the analysis as a result of Monte Carlo averaging. This could have a detrimental impact in an environmental context, when the mere possibility that a scenario may occur can be an important element in the decision-making process.